Climate Outcome NZ
  • Climate Outcome. Home page.
  • Latest posts & news
  • Temperature
  • Precipitation changes in a warming world.
  • Increased flood damage in a warming world.
  • Drought
  • Wind
  • El Nino Southern Ocilation. ENSO.
  • Sea Level
  • Polar melting
  • Arctic sea ice + weather.
  • West Antarctica
  • Ocean Acidity
  • Plant Die Back. Animal Migration.
  • Climate threats
  • Streams a vital resource.
  • Clean energy alternatives.
  • Climate Change in the Bay of Islands
  • The Author. Bob Bingham.
  • Satellite accuracy.
  • Reference sites

Bob Bingham Blog page.

A series of opinion pieces on, mostly climate change and related subjects to do with New Zealand.

Back to home page.

Sea level rise urgency.

25/4/2016

5 Comments

 
Picture
There has been quite a lot of interest in the speed and timing of sea level rise recently, brought about by the publication of new research and the sudden jump in world surface temperatures. The last IPCC report estimated a range of between 0.7 metres and 0.9 metres by the end of the century but there was a clause that specifically excluded Antarctica and Greenland’s melting ice sheets because not enough was known about them to quantify it. Most of the ice melting in Antarctica is from ice that is already in the sea and therefore does not contribute to sea level rise but the ice shelves hold the land glaciers in position and if the ice shelves go the land based glaciers slip quickly into the sea.
The results of the massive research effort to clarify the situation are now coming in thick and fast and they are all bad. James Hansen has sounded the alarm.

Just a quick note on what I believe are the important parameters. Firstly, just one metre is enough to bankrupt most economies and will displace two hundred million people causing a huge refugee problem if not world wars. Secondly we want to know the timing, if it will happen in our families’ lifetime so that it becomes of personal interest. So, all we want to know is,  when are we going to get a one metre sea level rise?
The interesting part is that almost all the science on sea level rise shows that it rises very slowly under natural circumstances. But we are not in a natural situation. We have raised the level of CO2 in the atmosphere to 400 ppm instantaneously in paleological terms and we have raised the temperature by 1.5 C in a nanosecond in Earth’s history terms and there is no precedent for that.
​
Picture
So what do we have? There are three regions of the planet that hold enough ice to raise sea levels quickly and these are Greenland, West Antarctica and East Antarctica and they are all very different.
Firstly, it should be mentioned that the atmosphere is not a good conductor of heat and will not melt ice quickly and so this somewhat rules out Greenland because it does not have much ice sitting in the ocean. It is melting fast and will be a contributor and it pays to listen to Greenland specialist Jason Box. 
​Greenland's meltwater is upsetting the Gulf Stream and may give Europe some very bad weather but it is melting at the rate that could give a 100 to 300 mm of sea level rise quickly. It is part of the picture.

Picture
Second is that East Antarctica has by far the biggest amount of ice but it is remote and poorly observed so that apart from the knowledge that the Totton glacier is losing mass from the bottom of its glacier tail sitting in the sea, not all that much is known. It is certainly melting around the edges but lack of access is hindering research.

Picture
I strongly recommend watching this half hour lecture video of Eric Rignot at the American Geophysical Union meeting.

Picture
This leaves West Antarctica which is a series of islands holding in position a massive sheet of ice around 1000 metres thick and resting on the bed of the ocean. 
What is happening here is that the temperature differential between the high cold Antarctic and the warming equator is increasing and the winds flowing from the cold to the warm are blowing faster.
​This is causing a turnover of the water at the edge of the ice so that the very cold surface water (-2 C) is being blown out to sea (as evidenced by the increasing winter ice) and is drawing the warmer deep water (4 C) nearer the surface. This warmer water has now reached the grounded ice shelves of West Antarctica and melting them from the bottom and it is doing so at a furious rate.

There are other minor regions of glaciers in Alaska and the Himalaya's which are also steady contributors.
Picture
Nobody has ever seen and recorded a massive ice shelf disintegrate before and so it is not researched. The ice shelves named Larsons A and B disintegrated suddenly from 1995 onwards and it was photographed from space but nobody was expecting it to happen and so there were no instruments in place to research how it happened. That is not the case now and millions have been spent on observing and researching various ice shelves to work out what is happening. This research is where the new warnings are originating but much of the research is not completed yet and will take years before it is published and then many more years before it becomes government policy.


We therefore have to get the honest opinions of five or six leading scientists who are working on the ice and can interpret the results of the research so far and where we are headed.
A quote from The Royal Society of New Zealand emphasises the urgency.
“Experience shows that uncertainties around climate changes can result in decision-making being postponed until changes are clearer. This ‘wait and see’ approach is in itself risky, since the direction and rough magnitude of climate changes, and the associated increases in key risks, are well understood.”
The distilled consensus of opinion appears to be that we can expect the additional 800 mm of sea level rise to make the one metre in around forty to fifty years. Close enough to affect the lives of most people alive today.
The New Zealand governments recommendation to councils is to plan for 500 mm by 2100 which is clearly inadequate.
Here is an even more pessimistic report by people better qualified than me.  https://www.kcet.org/redefine/sea-level-rise-could-come-much-sooner-than-you-think

5 Comments

Sea level rise. Adding the totals.

3/4/2016

8 Comments

 
Picture
There are so many reports coming out now about sea level rise that I am getting confused about the totals.

Picture
If we start with the IPCC Fifth report which only deals with thermal expansion, they have a range of scenarios, where only the worst case is valid, because we have already exceeding it, and that comes to 900 mm by the end of the century and about 500 mm by 2050.

We next have the report in Nature ‘Antarctica’s contribution to sea level rise by Robert DeConto’ where his research shows that the rate of ice loss will contribute one metre by 2100.
This only deals with Antarctica's contribution. 

There is an excellent presentation by Eric Rignot of NASA at the American Geophysical Union where he summarises the accelerating rates of all the big glacial regions but hesitates to come to a real estimate of the totals for the end of the century but explains a very dire situation.
And lastly we have James Hansen who uses his vast experience to point to conclusions about a nonlinear collapse of the big ice sheets and the consequent pulse in sea level rise which could be as high as four metres this century. 
Eric Rignot said that trying to model the rate of collapse of the ice shelves is so complicated that by the time it is done it will be much too late. In fact, he says that the current situation is unstoppable.
Michael Man one of the most eminent climate scientists said that he might quibble about some of Jim Hansen’s research but the conclusions were probably correct.
New Zealand’s government is still using the IPCC mid-range scenario of about 700 mm by 2100 even though it does not include melting glaciers and ice shelves and we have long passed any hope of restricting sea levels to those optimistic level. 
Picture
The NZ Climate Commissioner, Jan Wright is pointing out the folly of not facing the facts and planning for the future, but even she is using very conservative figures of one metre sea level rise.

We expect a government to look at the countries future and use the available facts to plan for the safest outcome, but there is a deafening silence or outright denial, that there is any problem at all.
We can’t change what is happening to the climate but we can plan our infrastructure to minimise the worst of the effects and it start by recognising the gravity of the situation. Here is a summary of some NZ infrastructure losses.
8 Comments

    Bob Bingham 

    Occasional blog posts on topical news items concerning the climate.  Please click the RSS feed to receive updates.

    Picture

    Archives

    December 2024
    April 2024
    June 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    May 2021
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    September 2019
    December 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    September 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Clean Water
    Climate Change.
    CO2 Levels
    El Nino
    Floods
    Methane
    Ocean Acidity
    Pine Island Galacier
    Sea Level Rise
    Soil Loss
    Storms

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly